The clergy of Mater Dei Seminary firmly holds to the infallible teachings of Vatican Council I (1870), especially on the primacy and infallibility of the Roman Pontiff and it is for this reason that the seminary follows the liturgy approved by Pope Pius XII.
Vatican Council I infallibly taught:
“For the fathers of the Fourth Council of Constantinople, following closely in the footsteps of their predecessors made the solemn profession: ‘The first condition of salvation is to keep the norm of the true faith. For it is impossible that the words of Our Lord Jesus Christ Who said “Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build My Church” (Matt. 16:18) should not be verified. And these truths have been proved by the course of history, for in the Apostolic See the Catholic religion has always been kept unsullied and its teachings kept holy.
“Indeed, it was this apostolic doctrine that all the Fathers held, and the holy orthodox Doctors renewed and followed. For they fully realized that this See of St. Peter always remains untainted by any error, according to the divine promise of Our Lord and Savior made to the prince of His disciples, “I have prayed for thee, that thy faith may not fail; and do thou, when once thou hast turned again, strengthen thy brethren.’ (Luke 22:32).”
The liturgy and liturgical laws are matters of the secondary object of the Church’s infallibility; Pope Pius XII, as a true pope, could not have promulgated a liturgy that was a danger to the faith. Furthermore, the Vatican Council also infallibly taught:
“We declare that the judgment of the Apostolic See, whose authority is unsurpassed, is not subject to review by anyone; nor is anyone allowed to pass judgment on its decisions.”
Therefore, since Pope Pius XII was a true pope, the liturgy promulgated by him is not subject to review by anyone nor is anyone allowed to pass judgment on the Pope’s decisions.
Besides the “Restored Holy Week” of Pope Pius XII, this same Roman Pontiff established for the universal Church the feast of St. Joseph the Worker, May 1, and extended the Lenten fast on Holy Saturday to midnight.
*Statement of Principle: CMRI and the Liturgy of Pope Pius XII*
From apostolic times Holy Mother Church has taken care each year to celebrate the principal mysteries of our Redemption, namely the passion, death and resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ, with an absolutely singular commemoration.
At first, the supreme moments of these mysteries, those of “the crucified, buried, and risen” Christ (St. Augustine, EP. 55,14), were recalled in a special three-day period. Soon a solemn commemoration of the institution of the most Holy Eucharist was added. Finally, on the Sunday immediately preceding the passion, a liturgical celebration of the triumphant messianic entry of Our Lord and King into the holy city was added. Thus there arose a special liturgical week which, by reason of the greatness of the mysteries celebrated, was designated as “Holy” and was enriched with exceptionally complete and sacred ceremonies.
In the beginning these rites were performed on the same days of the week and at the same hours of the day that the sacred mysteries occurred. Thus the institution of the Holy Eucharist was recalled on Thursday evening by the solemn Mass of the Lord’s Supper. On Friday there was a special liturgical function in the hours after noon recalling the Lord’s passion and death. Finally on Holy Saturday night, there began a solemn vigil which ended the following morning with the joy of the Resurrection.
During the middle ages they began for various pertinent reasons to set an earlier time for the performance of liturgical services on those days, so that toward the end of that period all of these liturgical services had been transferred to the morning. This did not take place without detriment to the liturgical meaning and confusion between the Gospel narratives and the liturgical ceremonies attached to them. The solemn liturgy of the Easter Vigil in particular lost its original clarity and the meaning of its words and symbols when it was torn from its proper nocturnal setting. Moreover, Holy Saturday, with too early a recollection of the Easter gladness intruding into it, lost its original character as a day of mourning for the burial of the Lord.
In most recent times another change, very serious from a pastoral point of view, took place. For many centuries Thursday, Friday and Saturday of Holy Week were holydays of obligation, so that the Christian people, freed from servile works, could be present at the ceremonies taking place on those days. During the course of the seventeenth century, however, the Roman Pontiffs themselves were compelled, because of the complete change in the condition of social life, to reduce the number of the holydays of obligation and to classify them as working days.
This is certainly to be regretted, since these liturgical services of Holy Week are endowed not only with a singular dignity. but also with a special sacramental force and efficacy for nourishing Christian life. Nor can there be proper compensation for the loss of these liturgical functions through those pious devotional exercises which are customarily called extra-liturgical and which are performed in the afternoon hours of these three days.
For these reasons during recent years experts on the liturgy, priests having the care of souls, and especially the bishops have sent earnest petitions to the Holy See begging that the liturgical functions of the last three days of Holy Week be restored to the hours after noon, as formerly, so that all the faithful might more easily be present at these services.
After considering the case carefully, Pope Pius XII restored the liturgy of the sacred vigil of Easter in 1951. The celebration was to be held at the discretion of the Ordinary and as an experiment. This experiment was highly successful everywhere, as many Ordinaries reported to the Holy See. These same Ordinaries also renewed their petitions for liturgical restoration for the other two days, asking that the sacred functions be moved back to the evening hours as had been done in the case of the Easter Vigil. Moreover, evening Masses, provided for in the Apostolic Constitution “Christus Dominus” of January 6, 1953, were being said everywhere and were attended by many. With all these things in mind Pope Pius XII commanded the Commission of the Restoration of the Liturgy established by him to examine the question of restoring the Ordo of Holy Week and propose a solution. After obtaining that answer, His Holiness decreed, as the seriousness of the affair demanded, that the entire question be subjected to a special examination by the Cardinals of the Sacred Congregation of Rites.
The Cardinals gathered in an extraordinary session at the Vatican on July 19 of this year. They considered the affair and voted unanimously that the restored Ordo of Holy Week be approved and prescribed, subject to the approval of the Holy Father.
After all this had been reported in detail to the Holy Father by the undersigned Cardinal Prefect, His Holiness deigned to approve what the Cardinals had decided.
Hence, by special mandate of the same Pope Pius XII, the Sacred Congregation of Rites has decreed the following:
I. The Restored Ordo for Holy Week is Prescribed.
II. On the Proper Hours for the Celebration of the Sacred Liturgy of Holy Week.
ON THE DIVINE OFFICE (paragraphs 4 and 5 are omitted here. — Ed.)
ON THE MASS OR THE PRINCIPAL LITURGICAL FUNCTION
III. On Extending Lenten Abstinence and Fasting until the Midnight of Holy Saturday.
All things to the contrary notwithstanding.
November 16, 1955
Gaetano Cardinal Cicognani,
Prefect, Sacred Congregation of Rites
L+S
+A. Carinci, Archbishop of Seleucia
Secretary, Sacred Congregation of Rites
*For further reading, please see this article from the American Ecclesiastical Review: The History and Spirit of Holy Week by Fr. John H. Miller, C.S.C.
Also, this little booklet: Which Rite is Right by Fr. Kevin Vaillancourt